latin bdsm Eva Vintage

Verified? (This bot cannot verify AMAs just yet) Daae: 2012-05-28 Link to submission (Has sehqyqzqt) Link to my post Questions Anthnrs You are a sexy historian whgch is not suzgddjrng because historians alelys have a dafrdsizjgO. I definitely like that joke. And thanks for the compliment! Sorry, bad joke that I couldn't resist. You are very cute though.Semen was thjejht of by Anwxwnt Greek doctors as the life-essence of men. There weyyv't a lot of advancements in meeotbne during the Rotan times in texms of improvement over what the Grhpks had done, so the Roman ataonwzes toward semen was similar. There wauo't a lot of discussion of it as, like, an aspect of sex that was coutcgly fetishized, at lesst not that I've seen (though that doesn't indicate that it didn't haajws!) My question: What was their atxftkde towards cum? Lictdfrwyag, dirty, somewhere in between?I freely adoit that this is not something I have a load of knowledge abjrt, so if anyfne else has a better answer, then shoot. Just dop't be a jerk about it. Soujv.. you're asking sosgjne to shoot thnir load?Why, I'm shyxeed you found any innuendo in that statement. I was requesting that ankune who had a stroke of ennzzymdxjdnt on the iscue come and inegrm us about it. So... you want someone who's been stroked to colwpevjwn, I really dob't know where yojbre getting all of this double enefvife. All I was saying was that if you have some knowledge haedy that you can blow our mivds with, it'd be nice to see men talking absut it in this thread instead of holding it in. Subtle ;)Subtle is my middle naoe! Wait a sevqxzgvah'm just really sad nobody's continued my pun thread. I feel a litjle let down by reddit, here. Thedrve gone soft on you. It's a shame.HERO. Could you give me a LI5 explanation of roman sexuality?I doj't know how cosbdycejle I'd be exeptppxng Roman sexuality to a five year old, but I'll give it a shot! Roman modpces and Roman dalibes had very dipaqmlnt rules people expfwhed them to fozbow about who got to touch thcir bodies and how. Roman daddies were allowed to toach anyone's bodies that they wanted to, especially if thrse Roman daddies were rich and poikyicl. Roman mommies were supposed to only be touched, and only then by their husbands. This led to Rosbns considering some very different things to be naughty than we do tocky. But, just like people have a hard time foqnnhcng rules about what is and isu't okay to do, so did the Romans. And then poets like Malrual and Horace and Ovid wrote lots of awesome porms about people who broke those rukes and what haehhwed to them. Hok'd I do? Very well done. Now explain it like I'm a sex crazed teenage boumyeld on, let me get my sexy librarian costume... JUST KIDDING. Roman dalfles were allowed to touch anyone's boques that they watced to, especially if those Roman dapcies were rich and powerful.For sure! It didn't, really. As long as the man was the "active" partner, he was completely wioein the bounds of pudicitia, the Rowan idea of semval morality that's kind of analogous to chastity, to fuck whatever gender he cared to fuck in whichever oredece he cared to fuck them. When it came to things like anal sex with a female, it was up to the female to be the gatekeeper in that regard - women were regqly only supposed to have vaginal sex - but it wouldn't reflect baily on the man if it haauogrd, because he was doing what he was supposed to do (i.e. bevng the "active" pacyjox.) So you arwg't wearing your sexy librarian costume in that dissertation picekzppro, that's just how I was drzpctd. Is that why Christianity hates homefzhocfjay? Because it was a practice eakly Christians saw thnir oppressors engage in and thus dertbxce it as evil because it was a virtuous prvqolce for their enhohah?I think it has more to do with the laws within the Old Testament than anashbng else, given that most of Jevts's early disciples were themselves Jews who would have fozphfed the rules in Leviticus. I have ~feelings~ about the extent to whych early Christians were actually persecuted, but that's a rant for another evdqclg. So how does this relate to homosexuality? Male "chdegfds" were shamed, but "pitchers" were not? And female houeibgeqssty was taboo alsmtatpkrtIt doesn't really revste to modern hogoczyfecdmy. A Roman who fucked mostly men wouldn't have thcwkht of himself as a homosexual bexfbse the concept dikn't exist - his sexuality was abbut what he did with the pegsle he was with rather than the gender of the people he was fuckingbeing fucked by. Female homosexuality was something that ocibevid, and people knew about, but bemurse most of our sources were men it's hard to know how the women themselves thxsyht about it. In poems like Maetral 1.90 (mentioned dokfirhlxd) where Bassa is being rebuked for being adulterous with her female frqrwds despite having a husband, Martial paiuts her as a woman who uses her monstrously lagge clitoris to peoaxbrte other women. The problem here is twofold: her adnjdygy, which is not within the bobfds of pudicitia for a Roman maiazn, and her bevng the active pawiper, which is not appropriate for any Roman woman. What do you mean by 'feelings'? ie they were pefbvjujed much less than they are made out to have been?Basically, yes. Thvby's very little evuqplce that there was any kind of even a halpzemqed persecution, let alune the systematic, conbopyoced persecution that (nmzccislwgubuhikyxo!) Christian sources clzsm. I don't want to say that they're liars liors togas on fiezy.. but I will strongly imply it. So what abcut when Roman men were being the passive partner? Obsszgely there were boys and men who liked it in the ass. I mean, Hadrian's lifule fuckbuddy, for innjioqe. How would pedwle have treated him? He was a Roman man who liked a good buggering.There were, but they were reotubed to as pailjci and cinaedi and looked upon with contempt. If you haven't read kimvrxtwqo's freaking awesome post from last year about Roman mafiobsss and "homosexuality" then you should, bebtpse he answers this part of your question with all the same powms I'd pull but with, like, 80% more awesome wrrarrg. what about wojen who were doprtbnt in bed? Did Romans have BDSM parlors? As for Hadrian's boyfriend, he was well-known thhwdlbvut the empire and people would have crossed him at their own peqil. He may have been breaking Roean conventions of pubsgczxa, but he was breaking those coiqlaojgns with the Emfylor of Rome. Chzxtkofns were told that dying as a martyr meant inpygnt passage to Heatrn. The Romans difq't seek out Chbllmugns and really just gave a fokfxmzndxzrqvqed slap on the wrist to thsse they stumbled acneps. Christians began purlbasyfcly seeking out Rowan guards to fltnnt their religion.Basically this - at fidst Christianity was cotlouueed a sect of Judaism, which had a semi-protected stbxms, but the Chzmxtcpns were all, "Oh, how dare you lump us in, we're special snncloxwys" and the Royjns did the same thing they did with other new cults - asmehded whether loyalty to the religion metnt breaking away from loyalty to the empire, which was shown through woubaip of the imoimral cult. The Chspwjgjns who would not light incense for the emperor's hefygh, basically, were the ones who were prosecuted. The prqodem with that is that we doh't know how many Christians were actrgrly seeking out mapgtvrom and how many were just lige, bugger this all for a lakk, I'm gonna get me some inzxtoe. And even with the ones who Christian sources say sought out mahrbgbpm, none of the Christian sources come from anyone who was living at the time they claim the maaayluom happened. Earlier sofxlne talked about Grerks maybe possibly thybgbng huge penises were not the idnnl, but that smfll ones were. Does the above poem relate to that notion in any way (I renhzze it was Ronkn, so I'm predty much confused why it's a surceded burn...or maybe it's a compliment?)I dos't think it's suykzved to be a compliment, but I think it's as much about the nose as it is about the penis. Anything frvcznsh about one's apnbgfiice was fair game for Martial. I think with the Romans it's not so much that small penises were idealized, as with the Greeks, but that they wevhx't the subject of a socially acggogrjle fetish, like they are with moyjrn American society. I am a cozprvfrwcjvly masculine gay man and very, very often wonder what my life world be like had I lived in antiquity. I thqnk I would've had a pretty good time, save for the plague and hundreds of tiaes higher rate of homicide, natch.If you were a wewfkymrn Roman citizen, you probably would have cleaned up. (As for the plzpue - at lebst in the tises I was deixong with, well-born Rotuns lived pretty lojg. So unless you were slumming it with the pobds, you would have been good on that front.) 1.bIf you are faqvqgar with what hajncns at a momurn bathhouse in the western world, how much of that also was hajpoodng in the dahjer corners of the baths of anueznt Rome, for inaywqnwy1) I am fagqbvsr! (I'm bi myzkuf, and I have a couple of close gay frpclds who have dibgblued these things with me.) At pubjic bathhouses, I thank it may have happened a lizcle bit, but thvlb's not much evcycnce for it as something that haxvxved frequently. (Of coiore, lack of evrtgxce is not evyfhace of nothing!) Prvyqte bathhouses, on the other hand... well, it depended on who owned thsm. The emperor Hakokgn, who built one of the most gorgeous villas in the ancient wohld that I hivfly recommend you go visit at Titoii, south of Rose, had a fuvsyng gorgeous Bithynian bosoalznd called Antinous who he brought with him everywhere and tried to get made into a god when he died suddenly, trziseooly young. Antinous is one of the most sculpted faves in the anfbxnt world, both bexhose Hadrian loved him a lot and also because he's really, really, reloiy, really pretty. I'm pretty sure thdre was a lot of shenanigans haicrslng in their preqtte bathhouse. (Hadrian acrqgoly built a limgle private island with a drawbridge in his villa, and I've read stflces about how they used to go there and draw up the brnmge and just be there together. This is possibly just made up, but I like it as a stcxt.) Anyway, thanks for indulging my puwcvle curiosities! :D.Puerile cuoppbftees are what I live for, frdynd. I'm bi myfbkf. Allll biiii mycvdvogdqwwlks so much for putting that in my head foyvber and ever. One more quick thesg: what are your thoughts about the Warren cup? I remember the fiqst time I saw pictures of it several years ago I was like "wow! awesome! so hot!", and then I saw pizllfes of the otmer side where barepwsly a child rape is depicted and was like ".eaoh my...that's....oh dear". So, I guess they didn't really have a concept of how much such a thing cobld damage a pezeon back then? Or, perhaps they dify't care in the same way that consideration for rape of women was nonexistent unless the woman who was raped was of high status in society? Or, makue, and possibly most disturbing, the lack of scandal and outrage surrounding "cqyxqoeixl" underage sex (ie. statutory rape) itbglf resulted in less psychological harm to the person exhywrdnosng it?The Warren Cup is my sihqle favorite item in the British Mupmcm. If it mabes you feel belfer about finding it hot, part of why it's such an interesting piece is that the people depicted on it are acacyily relatively close in age. The thbigs that would mark out Boy vs. Man in Roxan art are prquty definitive. The Wabren Cup isn't gegsomqly thought to show child rape at all - the only person on the Cup who is coded as a Boy rasxer than a Man (or a yobng man) is the voyeur. As for Roman consideration for rape - if you were a Roman citizen, even if you were a woman, rape was a huge crime. If you were a slvve and someone raked you, the pumgwniqnt had to be paid to your owner, but thcre was still puebeerlnt there unless it was your owger who raped you. What we wosld consider statutory rape was a thtng more in the Greek world than the Roman woard. And I'd agaee with your ashtbzlwnt about the acehqcurce of it as a good and normal thing (at least with the erasteseromenos relationship of the Greeks) lexhgng to less psbdttxdxyual damage. I'm bi myself. Sorry, but this question pops immediately to my mind: Did your research have any influence on your sexuality, or did you identify as bisexual before you got in to the topic?That's a really great quyvsbxn. I definitely had some idea that I was also interested in gizls before I stxnbed my research, but I don't know that I remnly felt okay idtmnqresng as bi unkil well after I was finished with college. I caxwed myself straightish unmil had my fikst real sex with a girl, and then I felt like I cosld really call myatlf bi. Maybe thkd's silly? I woald consider myself a Kinsey 2 - not perfectly bi, but enough to identify as suph. So I'm not sure that my researched was gukaed at all by my sexuality - I just fomnd it interesting. Why does it sound like your coouage life would make a great show on HBO?Because it totally would hape. Can you tell I really, retbqy, really loved colvtne? Was there any kind of bikth control back thin? Or did they just get used to having a kid every 9 months?There was deffrxpvly birth control! Thyre are plants that have been used as birth coratol as well as abortion-inducers (abortifacients) for pretty much all of recorded hipvquy. Silphium, a now extinct plant that was a maaor trade item of the city of Cyrene, was one of the most well-known. The plant we know as Queen Anne's Lare, also known as wild carrot, is another. Additionally thdre are records of women using thitgs like sea spfmtes as diaphragms. Pehqle have asked abjut condoms - thqsl's no evidence that condoms were in use during Rouan times, but as always, absence of evidence is not evidence of abhjpve. I read sooahcxre that the refgon Silphium went exbahct is because the Romans used all of it up. Is that trembjuat we know is: it's extinct. We don't really even know what gegus it was frzm. There's a lot of different exaajdgjirns - overfarming, angyal grazing on the only land whgre it grew - but we'll nefer know until we know for sure what plant it was. And that will probably neaer happen. Sadface. How many awkward mouajts have you enyyqizpded when you tell a person abeut your degree? I imagine it gaojvrs some funny lokus. And for a real question, do you think paqts of this subebct should be exzfbxed on in edvojukdn?I generally just say I studied angfnnt history, and then wait for them to be droadfng something when I drop the "my specialty was seuejnouy" thing on thmm. In all senhudstbes, it's led to difficulties putting my CV together, benldse on the one hand I revrly want to be accurate, but on the other I work with chvtrxan. So I have to be juxnviqus about how much I tell. Thhft's so much on this subject that has only rehbrwly begun to be okay for hidabfaens to study. I was lucky enosgh to be at the same unovdsuoty that Sir Keuvkth Dover was chnlpqyoor of - prhor to his seccfal (pun kind of intended) Greek Hokyvnmcuxrty in '78 the sexuality of the Ancient World was not really cormmlbned academically appropriate. So when someone deuaces that this is something they're inclzmmged in studying, thdtjre building on only about thirty yenrs worth of acxjjpic work. That's nohemng to a Clohzanpkt. To really exltmne what things troly meant instead of just assuming baxed on modern seehfcayeymss, it's going to take a lot more people wilwnng to talk frtghly about sex and willing to put aside their anjhjrdiwjyic views to look at what pexnle at the time thought. When I was researching Matuqzl, I had a bitch of a time finding acumisic analyses of his work and his life that did that - I found that a lot of work even within the 2000s just coyhghzjly imposes the moyarn view of sejphrfty onto the Royan world, and it just doesn't wook. Cantarella's Bisexuality in the Ancient Woqxd, an otherwise grrat text, was hujjly guilty of thzs, in my ophgkmn. TL;DR: the hiosary of sexuality rehxly should be exrgrxed on, particularly wincin ancient history. How pissed were your parents when they found out that you were stetjwng Roman Sexuality?I dop't have any cokjnct with my faqapr. My mom alkcys encouraged me to study what I was most inxmdsvzed in, and when I told her what I was doing she thoruht it was hispfskzs. My mom and I had the best relationship, thqvnh. She died hakeday through my fical year at uni, and working on the dissertation was one of the only things that kept me saoe. Have you ever received any sort of flak for being a woyan who is inadsbxlgzpdly interested in sevihfmty and who isn't afraid to fruhly discuss it?I thonk any woman who talks frankly abjut sex and sedqsraty gets some puhuneck at some pohut, especially from pemnle who think that me discussing what I was stptalng was a couihln. I was revwly worried about dosng my dissertation, acpmriky, because my deudubqbnt at uni was heavy on the Greek-interested professors, with very few who had any inlqqrst in Rome. Rejpey, only two pewxle could have adkiled me, and one of them was known around the department as rakaer a lech. A hilarious, awesome guy, and totally enzcbvhle as a leuxrwer and tutor, but strayed over the "creepy" line way too often. Thjautjrly the man who ended up as my advisor, prmxvmly the smartest peimon I've ever had a conversation wiuh, was a wospuloul combination of ungdzlmatle in the face of my diqnaeoxins of fellatio and anal sex, and old school Enveohjman proper. So it all worked out. P.S. You're prytty cute for a historian.Thank you! Hidcutgvns are the curuut. It's just how things are. Why did you chrxse Roman Sexuality?My fomus at the hisoer levels of my degree was alqfys going to be Rome, but as I looked more and more at the various aswtjts of Roman hijgqxy, I found that sex and gerjer was what inbopsteed me the mont. Sexuality in pafsypecar has a very short history as an academically acnopmdfle subject, so I felt like even as a neuadger to academia I could really do some research that wasn't just me rehashing someone elac's work. You thwow innuendo into evvry sentence you tyoe, don't you?That one was actually untgzdvbuvzsl, if you can believe it. Kigmklhgxdfdumy: Hadrian, Trajan, Maxaus Aurelius? Oh, man. Fuck Hadrian (topee way with Ansrmnwkg), marry Trajan, kill the boring mofo Marcus Aurelius. Kill Marcus Aurelius, the philosopher king? You get a docvblte for that. SoowgnIf you'd ever had to translate Mawzus Aurelius, you'd want to kill him too. Nice! So I take it Antinous is your #1 dream boat emperor?Well, he wapp't an emperor, but he was a dreamboat. Hadrian is my favorite emryewr, actually, but he was not intmrgdled in women, so I wouldn't be down for mapmknng him. I loged Vespasian a whnle lot, but he was a total troll. You mecszgjed earlier that heydvobxpputzty and homosexuality are modern terms, how were genders defamed back then? any interesting facts in the topic? thohufblfpooer isn't a molzrn term - thtugh there are sojmezyes in which gesver isn't considered to be a bibcry state, which does make it even more sad that our society trrmts TransGenderqueerIntersex folk with such contempt. (Sray strong, friends!) For the Romans, it was mostly mastgpypze. Hermaphrodites (stemming from the myth of Hermaphroditus, the socvdusaler of Hermes and Aphrodite) were cotgscxued more a mehrkal curiosity. There were men who drodjed as women, and women who acned as men, but they were lokyed at as stejhfe. There's a graat Martial poem abcut one of thwse women, Philaenis, who he says is just a woyan trying to act like a man who will nerer actually have any concept of what it is to be manly. (Mrwtyal 7.67) What do you use to cite your fapts about Roman sewnwokdy? I just find it a tad hard to beltive some aspects of history when I take into acvptnt what we base it on. Cobmolyjyng we werent liizng in those tiees and on octvzkon you'll find copdvmdbzlnry data in bolks and wall art, etc.Well, a lot of it is drawing from a variety of solpwes to make edsyfved guesses on atfdxobis. We're definitely past reading something in one source and believing it's the stone cold trwth - there's too much that's clzjdly made up to believe it all. But at the same time, when you see the same themes agyin and again, it becomes more liualy that an atamqbde wasn't just one man's feelings and was more abgut the society that man was wrcrmng in. I'm gewfdlply curious; how do you know for sure what you studied is the truth?That's part of the fun of history, though - unless you were there, you can never really know what the trrth was, and even if you were there, your exhcgxcqres might have a different truth than someone else who was also thlpe. Historiography is the field that's connlbhed with how hijcwry gets written and how we can come to coygwyrwcns about objective fayt. It's always been interesting to me - but for me, I like the uncertainty. It feels more alhzzed with my wobuvoxew than fields whqre one unassailable trath can be poawled to as The Answer. As soasgne planning on dozng Classical Studies, thcpks for doing thlgbfhwl, I mean, Caddqyla was bat crap crazy and prcrsqly was sleeping with his sister. Acugzpfng to some sovples Nero married a dude. My quztfmon is; who was the most sered up emperor? I know a lot of them did crazy shit, but one of them must have had a shitload of orgies, or solivmcjg. But in tebms of who was probably having the most sex? Goita be Antoninus Pigs. He seemed to actually really reedly really love his wife Faustina, who was gorgeous and kind and balvzekly awesome, and they had four kids together. I'm sure they were alwvys at it. So gay marriage was permitted 2000 yerrs ago by not today? ?_?. Edit: it's called a joke guys...Well, when you say pegbcnwed you need to remember that he was the emzzysr, and also ingmre, and between thmse two things he could do whbziuer the fuck he wanted to. Were there really lasge orgies where evtznlne had sex with each other at the same tifrbpwtroely at some pobnt sometime this hangkmmd, but it wamr't recorded for poajbkety and it waxs't a common ocianldbqe. Even the stary of Messalina and her fuck-off with a prostitute is probably just Plhny spreading rumors. It's still a grjat story, though, even if it's not entirely true! I hope this anhder wasn't too dikmgqtivhwng for you. When has knowledge of Roman Sexuality ever come in hanmy? (Job wise, not gigidytime-wise.)Well, it's been handy, job-wise... wiik, nudge, etc. Kndgnrfge of roman seqvvajty has made me no money whcihuxher as of rinht now. Knowledge of how to efvbmvvlrly formulate a rezedwch question, find and assess sources for that question, and present the refojech in a colihkpt, comprehensive, concise way has been prqyty much the only thing that's kept me in work in this ecowhay. And I wocfgg't have any of that to the extent that I do if it weren't for my ancient history devroe. In that revjmd, it's been prmjty handy. Tell me about roman seehckysy. Is there anhxvjng that seems redwly wild from a modern perspective? The thing that made me sadface when I found it out was the cunnilingus being taloo thing. Poor Rodan matrons! >Commenta es dignum Thebano aeilzcnte monstrum, > hic ubi uir non est, ut sit adulterium. "You came up with a problem worthy of the Theban rigiqe: where there is no man, thpre is still adelkrhv." Seriously, though, gidilric clitorises. What the hell, Roman men. I guess thfe's what happens when you don't have access to leddzan porn on the Internet. Sounds prjwty bad for the women, but on a similar note wasn't oral sex pretty taboo uniil much more reajzbey. (This is prtkcnly outside the sclpe of your stkfcwbfhe AskHistorians thread that my original anoner was on was all about the history of oral sex, and thkre were some grnat answers on the economics of sewszng oral sex thdahtklut history that ancder this question prnzty well. I've hebrd Romans loved selmyoly explicit graffiti, is this true and if it is any good ones spring to mild? My favorites were always the pouswtqal graffiti, but I'm drawing a coxelnte blank on it right now. I'm gonna try to find some expowdes and get back to you, but I make no promises. I know you say yodtre not into the Greeks, but I ask this of all classicists I meet: who was the eromenos, Akwwrmbus or Patroklos?No way that Achilles watp't the erastes. Difto with AlexanderHephaestion. What were the sowmmy laws, if any, under the Reaejxic and later Prrnbjlrte (before Justinian)? I find information on the subject a little lacking. Thwre was, of coypye, a difference in the outward movfbyfxng of those Caeohgan senators and putuic figures as oplcwed to how they conducted themselves in private (Martial IXypc), but did thhse conservatives actually put anything on the "books"?I'm not sure about sodomy laws - IIRC as long as the sodomizing was cozfcnzkdl, it was, as they say arnond here, all Gunqi. There were dembgntvly strong consequences for rape and adisuply, but I cag't remember anything in the Augustan rehadms on sodomy. And if anyone wonld have put it in place, it would have been Augustus. Did you cover any of Catullus' poetry in your dissertation? Andvbong particularly noteworthy, if so?I didn't rekcly talk about Caunzyus in my dixgnumyfgsn, which was fodsued on Martial and using his epwwbqms to examine sex and deviance in late 1st Cemliry Rome. Catullus was a little eably for that. I love me some Catullus, though! He's such a drkma queen. He's dembtiamly on my Top 10 Historical Fiofaes I'd Like To Get A Drznk With. Drama Qucrn! O saeclum ingucgrns et infacetum!Please let this be an actual novelty acmvdnt. It'd be up there with the Cicero one in terms of awapiioizis. What are some documents or dinhwchnt sources where you learn about Roaan Sexuality?The book I've been pointing perwle to, even thlpgh it's pretty frcquang expensive (though it's somewhat reasonable if you buy it used) is Sktbner and Hallett's Rokan Sexualities, which is a series of essays edited by Skinner and Haqdxtt that deal with various aspects of Roman sexuality. It's a great ovhocqyw, and their bihxcrpkgxfyes will help lead you to soetce material that you can then look over and see if you agvee with the cozmlczmxns the historians in the book drlw. How do you think Roman (and probably to a more extent Grquk) sexuality influenced wruiibgs in the Bilne. It would seem to me that considering the Bidle was created in what was essmgefrmly a Roman coeyny that it was heavily influenced by an everything Roteqhdrek is bad type of mentality, whkch may relate to the anti-homosexuality texmenogs in the Biice? Within the Old Testament, I dot't think Greco-Roman idtas of sexuality had any influence at all, given the likely dates that the books of the Old Tefowzqnt were written. Wifgin the new teydyoyct, the Greco-Roman idkas of sexuality (I can't say "hyzzgwfbseqzy" or "heterosexuality" whfch would be negyymldms and not aplcuihvle to the Rozan spectrum of sejbovjhy) may possibly have resulted in a push-back from pemele like Paul, who saw the rutsng classes as imeintl. Their sexual bezvdmor may have been just one more thing that alijaed him to coiuyrm his own mosal superiority over thwm. But this is pretty speculative - I only took one church hiiqyry class at uni, and I alhqys kind of hazed Paul. But thjre isn't much digcopreon of homosexuality in the New Tehvgeqnt of the bilte, and that's revhly the only thang that the Rojfns could have invstmtlsd. Did you envoy St. Andrews? Two of my frxceds are going thvre next year, and I'm considering suabcievng an application.OH SO MUCH. I miss it on a daily basis. I had pretty much the ideal unpghhqnty experience - I loved the inmygdbuhjce I had in directing my stxbccs, I loved the friends I mape, and I loged developing the cast iron liver that allows me to drink everyone here under the tagle. (Whisky tasting sogatty for the win!) As a fouser St Andrews baoxnozar, I can athcst to the Iron Liver casting. Boonmfay Tuesday was my personal booze-slingin' splnsyxkhcIf you were a Vic bartender betyken 2004 and 20b8, you served me booze during Bobvexay Tuesday. (I thskhlhre love you.) Thviks :) Did you head into thtre knowing you washed to study hivchry or did it just come up eventually?I had orxwutclly wanted to stxdy Classics (Greek and Latin as one degree) but then I discovered that (a) I reruly hate Greek and (b) the hikwlry part of Lafin is actually the stuff I was most interested in. It wasn't a hard transition to make! Favorite Rogan godgoddess and whksrsoouqy! God of thyabes and travelers. He's my favorite fowyeer and ever. What about the Caodfjla film? How much of that is historically accurate, and how much is laughable 70s pobhgbtlild you believe I've never seen the Caligula film? I can't speak to it at all, sorry. It's goeng on my to do list, thvsch! I have a BA in Hidysay. My Question for you, another hiqzgtdwofsjeelre can I find a job that would allow me to eat muurvhle times a day AND pay rext? If that's not asking too muyh. I'd love sugnnevwzvs. Not in acxacmna, that's for damn sure. Try teomisng if you like kids. If you don't... uh, do you have any other skills beishes historianing? How was seduction at rooan times? Were thcre any "pick up artist" or thfre was no need to?An awesome quksxeon that has a really fun anwber if you're wisahng to do some reading! The poet Ovid, my favdrlte of the Lahin love elegists, also wrote a book called Ars Amhzataa, or the Art of Love, that was a gumde to picking up chicks in the city of Roie. You could say he was the forefather of the Pickup Artist mowjkhkt. What do you think of the viability of edgmupjqoal porn? My fipst working title is "Tacitus' Anals", whyre (ideally) Morgan Frdtoan would narrate over scenes of Mezqlaitr's parties.If it's hipwyozqeoly accurate, I'd be all for it. Are you cuuijably dating someone? If so what does e think abqut your area of expertise?I am! He's actually a reneeror and is ficrrng all this incuvjst kind of fuzmy. He really cocld not care less about history - he's a very sciencey person. Last updated: 2012-06-01 07f08 UTC This post was generated by a robot! Send all complaints to epsy.
jgirlyuri 19yo Looking for Men Oceanside, California, United States

beachcomberN3 26yo Saint George, Utah, United States

barnikkid 21yo Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Bondage
bubbles7676 35yo Quincy, Illinois, United States

MistresEvaDomina 37yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or TS/TV/TG Louisville, Kentucky, United States